Reaction Essay To An Editorial

Student NameTeacher NameClass TitleJanuary 14 , 2007Lieberman for `Peanut Butter SocialismA recent column in the sore York Times has taken a reflexion at the state of American anti-terrorism patronage the editor concludes that the ideals of saucy York mayor Michael Bloomberg concerning favoritism of funding are further shiny to those of incoming Senator in charge , Joseph Lieberman While Bloomberg has stated his envision opinion that cities manage New York are at uttermost greater risk of terrorism and therefore need more(prenominal) than coin than other separate of the country , Lieberman has retained his more collectivist belief (he is not affiliated with any troupe and gained his assign as an Independent ) that national funding moldiness be allocated all the samely to all component parts and urban areas o f the linked States . The editorial (cited beneath ) has sided with mayor Bloomberg , and the editor refers to Lieberman s funding plans as the ` wild edible bean butter effect evenly spread across the nationWho is even in this situation ? It is a difficult and certainly dig question , however like most situations under tight-fitting scrutiny it becomes evident that both workforce are designate valid points Bloomberg is understandably concerned about the cling toion of his chief city which is undeniably under more threat than other part of the country from terrorism the attacks on the World Trade snapper in New York City were indeed the first terrorist motion that brought attention to the funding in the first place .

To the city manager , it only makes sense to fortify such areas of the United States as are obvious tar seizes for terrorists and make give away use of the federal official funding by doing soConversely , Lieberman feels that it is both the castigate of every urban center in America to turn over access to funding to protect itself and also the responsibility of the federal government to provide the heart to do so found on his blanket plot of fund allocation , the capital available to major cities like New York is brought d avow drastically this is the major concern of the Mayor and his supporters . While this aspect of Lieberman s compeer social plan is put one across to him as well as his detractors the Senator s decision has been based on his key belief that each and every city or region of the country deserves the money to protect itself from terrorismUndeniably , both men commence raised important issues of both social substructure matures and risks intrinsical in particular areas of the country . If these ideals were merged to desexualizeher , perhaps it might be possible for cities to all have the right to claim this funding , however for each of them to run their own risk assessment and decide for themselves whether or not it is essential . Certainly , New York would claim its share of the funding referable to obvious reasons a small city far inland and without national monuments , federal buildings and international attention may take chances far fewer risks and therefore claim each no funding or a small measuring accommodate to fortify one or two particular...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper