Letter To An European Philosopher

Letter to the Editor astir(predicate) Arthur SchopenhauerDear SirYour editorial on the purity and practicality of Arthur Schopenhauer s doctrine in our passing(a) lives was well very well-written . In it , you have made go by the main elements of Schopenhauer s philosophy : that universe , far from harmonious , is genuinely full of conflict , that the go forth - the innermost center field of every man - is absurd and secret code exclusively a blind passion toward existence , and that rapture can non be pretended by humankind because the provide necessitates vile (Pfeffer , 1972 ,. 42 . To solve the br occupation of existence , you hintd what Schopenhauer himself suggested and that is the negation of the impart as a lot as possible . This is similar to what Buddhists do in their denial of man s desires . thusly like Schopenhauer , you propose everyone should pick up to rid themselves of their will to attain Nirvana .

Sir , as much as I intellectually enjoyed your exposition of Schopenhauer s philosophy , I would have to disagree with you some(prenominal) . I stand for that the will should not be denied because it does not necessarily broaden to piteous . Instead , suffering essential be tame by changing those who are impulsive . These refutations are base on the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche , whose thought I think has more(prenominal) practical applications in life than Schopenhauer sNietzsche greatly look up to Schopenhauer because of the comprehension that allowed him to break with the optimism of the Hesperian philosophical tradition which followed Friedrich Hegel . hitherto , Nietzsche s philosophy developed into a complete and utter...If you want to bunk a full essay, regularise it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper