Manipulations of Memory Used by Orwell and Williams

The steady move upment of voluminous Brother as the every- verifyling entity in George Orwells 1984 is the premise for the role rectitude plays throughout the novel. fairness is leaned against society for the benefit of the government. Similarly, Tennes get wind Williams creates a uniquely different environment for his characters in The Glass Menagerie while maintaining the same function of truth as a source of distortion and control. Collectively, the themes of de gayization in 1984 and distortion of keeping in The Glass Menagerie relate to unmatchable another regarding the function of truth in each work to substantiate a signified of authority and deception.Oppression in 1984 as a direct doer of dehumanization is made quite evident within the text. The inner-party uses several persuade and torture tactic to rid society of past memories and experiences. The effects these tactics have upon truth are substantial in their regard. The intent of bl proclaim-up Brother is to reduce human beings understanding to a more basic, easily belied and empty slate where the ag closureas of the inner-party gage be executed with ease.We see the terminus to which understanding of the past affects ones attitude about the acquaint when Winston states, And when store failed and written records were falsifiedwhen that happened, the claim of the Party to have improved the conditions of human bearing had got to be accepted, because there did not exist, and never again could exist, whatever standard against which it could be tested (Orwell 93). This quote is said following Winstons frustrating conversation with the old man about demeanor preceding to the Revolution.Winston is coming to terms that the party has deliberately set out to disclose volumes memories in order to render them unable to contend what the Party claims about the present. If no one remembers life before the Revolution, because no one can say that the Party has failed humanity by forcing pe ople to live in conditions of scarcity, filth, ignorance, and famine. Rather, the party uses rewritten history books and falsified records to prove its severe deeds. This proves the theory that truth is dependent of storehouse and without memory truth is vitrine to handling and in this case dehumanization.Orwell not only suggests this theory through the events observed in Winston but also through Winstons suffer surrender to gargantuan Brother and its definition of truth at the end of the novel. After the inner-partys relentless attempt to purge Winston of any require thoughts, they achieve their goal of dehumanizing him. The narrator brings closure to the novel as he describes Winstons new character. He gazed up at the enormous face. 40 years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden downstairs the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstandingO stubborn, self- giveed banish from the loving breast Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose . But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He love Big Brother, said the narrator (Orwell 297). Winstons distinguishing characteristic towards Big Brother was prevailing during the earlier parts of the novel. This curiosity short transforms into animosity urging him to join a rebel group to revoke Big Brother. Despite these negative feelings, the power of dehumanization working against what years of curiosity have said to Winston to be true.His memory of Big Brother as being counterproductive to society is no daylong existent because his present situation says that Big Brother should be loved unconditionally. The fact that Winstons conversion was successful should focus the reader on truth and memory and how they are like. The dehumanization of memory stands as a principle theme in 1984 and it is through this theme that Orwell functions truth to let loose the desire of deception. Tennessee Williams takes a corresponding approach to truth and its function in his play, The Glass Menagerie.The characters, Amanda, tomcat, and Laura all face the similar dilemma of a falsified knowledge of universe. The pay off, Amanda, is the most blatant character in denial. Her situation as a single mother raising two children has subliminally deceived what she sees as factual. In a conversation with Laura Amanda is quoted Why youre not crippled, you just have a microscopic defect hardly noticeable, even When people have some urbane disadvantage like that, they cultivate other things to make up for it develop charm and vivacity and charm (Orwell 18)Seemingly everyone is quite aware that Laura is crippled however, Amanda will not come to terms with this occurrence. She deals with this unfortunate fact by fictionalisation to herself that her daughter is not crippled thus proving there to be itty-bitty veracity to any memories she has. Throughout the play Amanda is full of deceptions. Amanda c hanges her style of oral communication to a southern accent when Lauras gentleman caller arrives. Amanda states pass food an light clothes are what warm weather calls fo (Orwell 63). The reader is told that Amanda was born in the south. In spite of that, this is the first age she speaks with a southern accent.Amanda explains her newly discovered accent as her rejuvenated temper but the reader can assume this is her attempt to mislead the people around her to believe she is something that she is not further revealing her deceitful memory. Consequently, Tom and Laura are trapped by this illusion Amanda creates. Laura is highly dependent upon her mother therefore she is influenced by Amandas views. Tom carries the burden of providing for his family and cannot leave from this humans of lies and untruths. Amandas present state has deformed her memory and essentially distorted her sense of self and reality.Her ability to do this has given her control of what she can feel and therefo re how she can live her life despite not being able to escape from the poverty stricken life. Despite having severalize influences behind their respected themes, 1984 and The Glass Menagerie share a ballpark purpose to gain control over reality through the manipulation of truth. In 1984 Winston observed and experienced the tactics that Big Brother use to give the public a misleading view of truth. Through dehumanization, Big Brother achieved full authority over its citizens by erasing all memories of life before the revolution.With no memories to go by society was at the benevolence of Big Brother and what the inner-party considered acceptable. People could not judge right from prostitute because Big Brother was all they ever knew. The Glass Menagerie is comparable is the sense that Amanda needed to gain control over her life which seemed to be spinning into the ground. She was helpless and this feeling led her to shape her own reality in order to regain this sense of control. P eople are typically fearful of things they cannot conquer. Amanda could not achieve freedom from her environment therefore she created her own path through a deceptive memory.Her children were trapped in this life of lies just as Winston was in 1984. In both works we see a desire of power to control their respected situations. 1984 sought for the control of society whereas The Glass Menagerie sought for the control of the Wingfield future. The power of memory is existential to the human ability of perceiving the present. George Orwells 1984 and Tennessee Williams The Glass Menagerie manipulate memory in such a similar fashion that their functions of truth are nearly identical concerning their purpose.In 1984 truth is functioned against society for the sake of Big Brother and the inner-parties agenda through dehumanization. Similarly, Orwell uses Amandas character in The Glass Menagerie to demonstrate the importance of memory and how ones own deception of truth can distort their rea lity dramatically. twain pieces of work complement one another and solidify the case that memory or a deceitful memory for that matter is vulnerable to ontogenesis and the effects can be substantial in regard to ones sense of actuality.